The following article was written by AJ4JD and can be found on his blog located at http://aj4jd.blogspot.com/2009/06/lotw-vs-eqsl.html
LOTW vs eQSL
Well, I was checking the analytics (stats) on my blog here just a minute ago and found that someone reached my site via the search of “LOTW vs eQSL“. So I thought I would blog about the differences between the two. Obviously someone out there would like to know, and since I use both, I can give a little insite from my own perspective. So take it for what it’s worth.
LOTW as everyone knows is the online log book done by the ARRL. LOTW is pretty a pretty good program and fairly easy to use once you get everything set up. The set up is really the hardest thing about LOTW. With LOTW you first have to register an account, then wait for a card to come in the mail. Oh yeah you have to download a little program that allows you to get a an encrypted certificate so for security and validity reasons. I understand the purpose I suppose. I wouldn’t want someone taking credit for my contacts, but I digress. Actually, at the LOTW website they have a fairly understandable “Getting Started” guide that walks you through the whole process. Within a week I was all set up and ready to upload my log from the log book program I use. To date I’ve uploaded over 1000 contacts and have confirmed over 400.
The two real positives about LOTW, is that you can use it to confirm contacts for ARRL’s WAS, and DXCC awards and endorsements. Another positive is that it integrates quite well with the log book software I use (N3FJP’s AC LOG). Two clicks is all it takes to upload new contacts and receive any confirmations that are sitting out on the LOTW servers. As of last check, I lack 4 states to confirm in order to receive my Basic WAS award.
EQSL is another log book site I use and really like it alot. While you cannot use EQSL to confirm/validate contacts for ARRL’s awards, they have a few awards of their own and they recently arranged a means to validate/confirm contacts for a few of the awards from CQ magazine. As a matter of fact, I just earned the eDX award for confirming at least 25 DXCC entities. Of course in award to participate in their awards programs you have to be Authenticity Guaranteed (AG’d) and be at least a Bronze member. AG’d is eQSL’s way of providing security and proof that you are who you say you are, much like the certificates with LOTW. Fortunately, with eQSL, the AG process is much more simple than the certificate stuff with LOTW. As for the Bronze Membership, you only have to make a small donation to eQSL via PayPal. I’ve donated $5 this year and that keeps me Bronze for the year.
Other positives about EQSL include actual QSL cards and ease of use. That’s right, with eQSL you exchange with your contacts digital QSL cards. You can use eQSL’s design shop to make your own or you can make your own and upload the image yourself. Of course in order to do that you have to be at least a Bronze member. Otherwise, regular members have to choose from a small selection of designs. You can view the QSL’s you’ve received at any time. You can also print them out for your collection.
The one drawback is that it doesn’t integrate with my logbook software as LOTW. For instance if I wanted to upload my logs to EQSL from my logbook software, I have two options. One is to upload each contact individually via the logbook program. The other option is to export my log into an ADIF format, which my logbook program does quite well, and then upload it through EQSL’s upload interface.
So there you have it folks. To summarize, I use both. I like both really well. They are both pretty easy to use once you get the hang of it, and they make award applications so much easier. Of course I still love to receive QSL cards in the mail, however, this is a much cheaper option if you are on a tight budget.
Popularity: 39% [?]

Nice write up. I am new to HF but I don’t get the controversy one can use both as I plan to. I like the convience of eqsl but will send paper and upload logs to LoTW as well.
I stumbled across this as I was doing a search on my XYL’s boyfriend Google. I was surprised to see that my article was good enough for some one else to post it to their blog much less a club blog. Thanks for taking notice.
Allen, I agree with you, I don’t understand the controversy between the two either. They are both pretty simple to use and both are free until you want to apply for awards through them. I have to say though that eQSL is cheaper in that regard because you only have to be a bronze member and that only costs $5.00 for one year, where as to get the WAS via LOTW it’s $15.70.
I guess it’s a more or less a case of “to each their own”. I use both and it’s simple to upload my logs to both as I stated in my article.
Happy DXing and 73 de AJ4JD,
Tim Bird